On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 13:08 -0500, Scott Moseman wrote: > RHEL v5 > eth + hba > > If I'm using 'multibus' for my 'path_grouping_policy' in order to > utilize all of the channels, is there any way to prioritize how the 2 If you use multibus, all the paths will be used in round-robin fashion. You will not be able to prioritize. > interfaces are used? For instance, if we prefer to have the traffic, > when the bandwidth doesn't exceed a single channel, using the HBA > first and ETH second? How does DM determine which interface to use in > low bandwidth situations? It doesn't. One way to solve the problem: you can do is to change the grouping policy to by changing policy to be "group_by_prio", and having a priority handler that would give a prio value proportional to the bandwidth usage. But, note that this will keep moving the active path (may be that is what you want). > > Thanks, > Scott > > -- > dm-devel mailing list > dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
