> RHEL v5 > eth + hba > > If I'm using 'multibus' for my 'path_grouping_policy' in order to > utilize all of the channels, is there any way to prioritize how the 2 > interfaces are used? For instance, if we prefer to have the traffic, > when the bandwidth doesn't exceed a single channel, using the HBA > first and ETH second? How does DM determine which interface to use in > low bandwidth situations? > > Thanks, > Scott > With a multibus multipath, you can still use path priorities as a weighting factor for the (weighted) round-robin scheduler : 1/ set "rr_weight priorities" in multipath.conf 2/ find or forge a priority handler to return the weights your want for your paths Regards, cvaroqui -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel