Alternatively, if we use 'failover' instead, is there a way to have DM use the HBA as the main interface and only failover to ETH when necessary? Thanks, Scott On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 1:08 PM, Scott Moseman <scmoseman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > RHEL v5 > eth + hba > > If I'm using 'multibus' for my 'path_grouping_policy' in order to > utilize all of the channels, is there any way to prioritize how the 2 > interfaces are used? For instance, if we prefer to have the traffic, > when the bandwidth doesn't exceed a single channel, using the HBA > first and ETH second? How does DM determine which interface to use in > low bandwidth situations? > > Thanks, > Scott > -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
