Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] Implement generic freeze feature

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Andreas Dilger wrote:
+static int ioctl_freeze(struct file *filp)
+{
+    struct super_block *sb = filp->f_path.dentry->d_inode->i_sb;
+
+    if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+        return -EPERM;
+
+    /* If filesystem doesn't support freeze feature, return. */
+    if (sb->s_op->write_super_lockfs == NULL)
+        return -EINVAL;

Should this be EINVAL, or EOPNOTSUPP?  Usually EINVAL means there is
something wrong with the passed ioctl parameters (e.g. bad value),
while EOPNOTSUPP is "operation not supported" and makes more sense.

Sounds good.
I will send new patch-set which is rebased to 2.6.26-rc3 and includes
this fix, in this weekend.

Cheers, Takashi

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux