Re: [dm-devel] 2.6.10-udm1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2005-01-13T09:57:50, Nicola Ranaldo <ranaldo@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >I can't image a valid useful scenario where a LU can be presented
> >through different controler models or through different kernel
> >subsystems.
> Yes, this is true. But it is better to consider all the possibilities.

I can easily imagine different controller models, of which iSCSI vs
direct-attached fibre channel is just one example.

That said, I'd have a hard time imagining a useful scenario where they
are mixed within a single priority group, but I might be wrong. So the
hardware handler could be tied to a PG, maybe?


Sincerely,
    Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@xxxxxxx>

-- 
High Availability & Clustering
SUSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - A Novell Business


[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux