Re: [dm-devel] 2.6.10-udm1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



  If there is a local path and a remote iscsi path to the

[...]

I can't image a valid useful scenario where a LU can be presented
through different controler models or through different kernel
subsystems.

Yes, this is true. But it is better to consider all the possibilities.
For example, if we suppose a scenario where scaling to a redundant storage subsystem is very very expansive for a small business we may suppose a first phase where we have single controller/switch/hba per host etc. and a cheap backup low-prioirty iSCSI path. In a second phase we can upgrade the hw and buy the second hba/controller/switch and so on. Apparently it may be proper the hw-handler is on the iscsi server machine and the problem is solved, but i do not know if in the future, different scenarios may change this assumption.

Regards

   Nicola Ranaldo



[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux