> On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 10:46:12AM +0100, Stefan Bader wrote: > > Couldn't that goal be reached by simply giving path-groups a priority > > number? > > The original model had that - but then we decided to simplify > everything into an ordered list. Having an priority attribute doesn't prevent you from having an ordered list... > > If you add an message to change priority numbers any tool can change > > the behaviour and even force to switch to any group. > > I think that would be more complicated to manage and implement. > [How do you reference the PGs to change their priorities?] The same way as you reference them with your current approach. By index.
