On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 10:46:12AM +0100, Stefan Bader wrote: > Couldn't that goal be reached by simply giving path-groups a priority > number? The original model had that - but then we decided to simplify everything into an ordered list. > If you add an message to change priority numbers any tool can change > the behaviour and even force to switch to any group. I think that would be more complicated to manage and implement. [How do you reference the PGs to change their priorities?] Alasdair -- agk@xxxxxxxxxx
