Okay, I see, for simple updates a counter could indeed be sufficient to
ensure consistency by bringing the header with lower counter in sync
with the other one.
Regards
-Sven
Am 06.02.2016 um 20:09 schrieb Michael Kjörling:
On 6 Feb 2016 19:56 +0100, from sven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Sven Eschenberg):
Hopefully I did not miss any step and yes, it is not THAT
complicated as there is no concurrency involved, but the
transactions for resizing need to be crafted carefully.
I agree, it gets more complicated when resizing a container. I was
considering primarily the normal use case of a container that isn't in
the process of changing its size.
_______________________________________________
dm-crypt mailing list
dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx
http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
