On 10/19/14, Arno Wagner <arno@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Actually, it has a pretty good chance of working well. Once. > And if it is not too obvious and nowhere documented that the > attacker can get at beforehand. So basically if a device like this is meant to be used and distributed widely, one security requirement would be that each and every device uses a custom anti-tampering circuitry setup so that no two setups are identical. After one device has been compromised, a new custom setup has to be made, possibly at a new location. _______________________________________________ dm-crypt mailing list dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
