On 10/19/14 22:13, Cpp wrote: > This circuitry will > be reponsible for physical protection i.e. safe keeping the encryption > key and destroy it in case an attacker tries to access it. > Use some epoxy to prevent easy access to RAM > chips... cold boot anyone? Erm, just my two cents, but do you *really* think that this is a threat to you? In my opinion, costs and benefits should maintain balance... And I am quite sure that your self-made tamper safe solution will probably fail, if someone is really willing to break into your system. So I think ssh'ing to your system and entering the passphrase manually remains the best solution. Cheers Ralf _______________________________________________ dm-crypt mailing list dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
