On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 00:18:27 CET, Claudio Moretti wrote: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Thomas Bastiani <thom@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 16 January 2014 22:49, Claudio Moretti <flyingstar16@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> 2) Your life is in danger and somebody wants something from your > >> laptop: what do you think will happen then, if you wipe your key? > >> > > > > I believe Iggy made a point earlier: > > " [...] not everyone values their physical well-being over the compromise > > of their data." > > > > Which is a surprisingly (to me) valid point. There might be cases where > > someone might actually want to protect something at the cost of their life. > > > > I hadn't thought about that, but now that you mention it I've given it a > little thought and I agree. Suppose you're a police officer, you're > carrying an encrypted laptop with thousands of names of people in a witness > protection program, and you're captured by the mob. The mob has IT security experts and will not allow this person to trick them. > Without diving into further examples concerning the safety of the people > someone holds most dear, I believe this is the perfect example. For my option 1. "erase container while still free to act" it is a valid example. For option 2. "try to trick adversaries while already in their power", it is just as bad as all the others. Arno -- Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., Email: arno@xxxxxxxxxxx GnuPG: ID: CB5D9718 FP: 12D6 C03B 1B30 33BB 13CF B774 E35C 5FA1 CB5D 9718 ---- There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult. --Tony Hoare _______________________________________________ dm-crypt mailing list dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
