Re: [ANNOUNCE] cryptsetup 1.6.0-rc1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On dim., 2013-01-06 at 17:24 +0100, Milan Broz wrote:
> > Is this really the proper fix? Usually, userland needing headers
> more
> > recent than what's in linux-libc-dev should embed them, and
> correctly
> > handle at runtime if the interfaces are available.
> 
> These are two separate problems
> - you need to compile it on system where new header/kernel is not
> available
> - you need to detect that current kernel is not able to use
> userspace crypto API interface (this includes missing module etc.)
> 
> Both should be handled already.
> 
> > What happens here if cryptsetup is built on a recent enough kernel
> where
> > the header is present, and then run on an old kernel? Will it fail
> > gracefully?
> 
> It should print something like
> ...
> Required kernel crypto interface not available.
> Ensure you have algif_skcipher kernel module loaded.

Good. And what happens if cryptsetup is built on an old box not having
recent enough headers (typically a buildd) but is run on a box with
recent kernels? I guess there's no support, while, when headers are
embedded, they would be available.

Regards,
-- 
Yves-Alexis

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
dm-crypt mailing list
dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx
http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt

[Index of Archives]     [Device Mapper Devel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux