On 06/19/2012 03:54 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > I find the option name --without-activation to be quite long and hard to > type. Is there any reason why you didn't choose '--dry-run' as you first > suggested? Actually I wrote --dry-run, --no-activate, --no-activation, --without-activation on paper ... and then asked someone here what's the best:) Well, I think this option will be rarely used and I guess it is mainly for use in scripts. Option name says exactly what it is doing. The name --dry-run in more generic, as user, I would expect it can be used even for slot commands etc. If you have better name for it, no problem to change it still. Milan _______________________________________________ dm-crypt mailing list dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
