Am 19.06.2012 15:41, schrieb Milan Broz: > On 06/19/2012 02:29 PM, Arno Wagner wrote: >> I think having this functionality is a good idea. > >>> Trivial to add to code... (while I am doing another RC today, it can be done >>> today even ;-) > > Added --without activation option for luksOpen > http://code.google.com/p/cryptsetup/source/detail?r=a38fcafcff9ae75feda12bc84d04b2cdaa591f9f# > > # cryptsetup luksOpen /dev/sdc x --without-activation -T 1 ; echo $? > Enter passphrase for /dev/sdc: (good passphrase) > 0 > > # cryptsetup luksOpen /dev/sdc x --without-activation -T 1 ; echo $? > Enter passphrase for /dev/sdc: (bad passphrase) > No key available with this passphrase. > 2 I find the option name --without-activation to be quite long and hard to type. Is there any reason why you didn't choose '--dry-run' as you first suggested?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dm-crypt mailing list dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
