Re: Intel's encryption in Eaglelake or should we trust hardware encryption?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I don't completely trust crypto hardware.

My one critical standard for any cryptographic app is that it be open
source so that I or my distro maintainers can compile a copy and be
confident that it has no back doors.

Sure, all the plans/design documents for a piece of crypto hardware
could be released, but I'd always have doubt as to if that tiny chip
actually matched the plans and hadn't had a little bit of extra
silicon dedicated to logging the last eight thousand AES keys used.


I'm all for dual/quad core cpu's instead :). Having an idle core to
deal with encrypted disk IO is handy.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
dm-crypt mailing list - http://www.saout.de/misc/dm-crypt/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dm-crypt-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: dm-crypt-help@xxxxxxxx


[Index of Archives]     [Device Mapper Devel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux