Hi Rob, > Le 23 oct. 2015 à 15:18, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > >> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 7:23 AM, Vincent Cuissard <cuissard@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Align NFC bindgins to use marvell instead of mrvl. >> >> Signed-off-by: Vincent Cuissard <cuissard@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/nfcmrvl.txt | 12 ++++++------ >> drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/i2c.c | 2 +- >> drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/spi.c | 2 +- >> drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/uart.c | 2 +- >> 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/nfcmrvl.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/nfcmrvl.txt >> index 41058fc..0f95924 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/nfcmrvl.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/nfcmrvl.txt >> @@ -2,9 +2,9 @@ >> >> Required properties: >> - compatible: Should be: >> - - "mrvl,nfc-uart" for UART devices >> - - "mrvl,nfc-i2c" for I2C devices >> - - "mrvl,nfc-spi" for SPI devices >> + - "marvell,nfc-uart" for UART devices >> + - "marvell,nfc-i2c" for I2C devices >> + - "marvell,nfc-spi" for SPI devices > > There is no point in changing these and doing so breaks backwards compatibility. There is no break since these 2 drivers are new. In the same patchset I first set mrvl and replace it to marvell since I figured out that this is the name for all other Marvell drivers. > These bindings have a bigger issue in that it doesn't describe the > hardware, but rather just something to bind the Linux driver. The > compatible strings should be tied to what NFC chip you have (i.e. the > part number). Chips with same physical interface are compatible so I don't need to use a part number that's why I using a generic binding. Br, -- Vincent-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
