On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:57:45AM +0200, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: > On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 10:47:35 +0200 > Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Not really. The uart0 reset is the bit 16, in the reset register 4. > > > > 4 * 32 + 16 = 44. > > > > Not 112, but still not 208 either. > > The registers are numbered 1..5, then > > (4 - 1) * 32 + 16 = 112 Not on my version, and even then, UARTs are on the last reset register, which would still make 144. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
