On 14/10/15 16:26, Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
>
>
> On 10/14/2015 06:52 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> Franklin,
>>
>> On 14/10/15 14:36, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>> On 13/10/15 04:38, Franklin S Cooper Jr wrote:
>>>> Switch from dma_request_channel to allow passing dma channel
>>>> information from DT rather than hardcoding a value.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@xxxxxx>
>>> Acked-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx>
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c | 4 +++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
>>>> index d0f2620..957c32f 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
>>>> @@ -1866,7 +1866,9 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>> dma_cap_zero(mask);
>>>> dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, mask);
>>>> sig = OMAP24XX_DMA_GPMC;
>>>> - info->dma = dma_request_channel(mask, omap_dma_filter_fn, &sig);
>>>> + info->dma = dma_request_slave_channel_compat(mask,
>>>> + omap_dma_filter_fn, &sig, pdev->dev.parent, "rxtx");
>>>> +
>> Just discovered that you are using the parent device node.
>>
>> How about moving the dma bindings to the nand node instead and using
>> pdev->dev here?
> Roger,
>
> From what I can tell the interrupt number and the dma channel will always be
> the same no matter what. Doesn't matter if you have multiple nands or a
> combination of nands and nors. Since that is the case I think it just makes
> sense to leave it in the gpmc parent node and define it once.
Is prefetch/writepost dma used for NOR or any other GPMC peripheral
or only for NAND?
Let's also get Tony's inputs on this.
>>>> if (!info->dma) {
>>>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "DMA engine request failed\n");
>>>> err = -ENXIO;
>>>>
--
cheers,
-roger
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
