On 10/14/2015 06:52 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Franklin,
>
> On 14/10/15 14:36, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> On 13/10/15 04:38, Franklin S Cooper Jr wrote:
>>> Switch from dma_request_channel to allow passing dma channel
>>> information from DT rather than hardcoding a value.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@xxxxxx>
>> Acked-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx>
>>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c | 4 +++-
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
>>> index d0f2620..957c32f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
>>> @@ -1866,7 +1866,9 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> dma_cap_zero(mask);
>>> dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, mask);
>>> sig = OMAP24XX_DMA_GPMC;
>>> - info->dma = dma_request_channel(mask, omap_dma_filter_fn, &sig);
>>> + info->dma = dma_request_slave_channel_compat(mask,
>>> + omap_dma_filter_fn, &sig, pdev->dev.parent, "rxtx");
>>> +
> Just discovered that you are using the parent device node.
>
> How about moving the dma bindings to the nand node instead and using
> pdev->dev here?
Roger,
>From what I can tell the interrupt number and the dma channel will always be
the same no matter what. Doesn't matter if you have multiple nands or a
combination of nands and nors. Since that is the case I think it just makes
sense to leave it in the gpmc parent node and define it once.
>>> if (!info->dma) {
>>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "DMA engine request failed\n");
>>> err = -ENXIO;
>>>
> cheers,
> -roger
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
