On 14.10.2015 16:52, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 14 October 2015 02:13:49 Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: >> Ok, practically it should work for my purposes, but the change must be >> done along with added EMC device node description. >> >> I'm not so confident that it is correct to add description of static >> memory banks to ahb node though, please give me a short confirmation, > > The DT should reflect whichever memory ranges are accessible > on the bus. I've looked up the memory map in the data sheet, and > I think a reasonable representation would be > > /ahb { > ranges = <0x20000000 0x20000000 0x10000000>, /* AHB port 5 */ > <0x30000000 0x30000000 0x10000000>, /* AHB port 6 */ > <0x40000000 0x40000000 0x10000000>, /* AHB port 7 */ > <0x80000000 0x80000000 0x40000000>, /* EMC DYCS0/1 */ > <0xE0000000 0xE0000000 0x04000000>; /* EMC CS0-3 */ > > apb { > ranges = <0x20080000 0x20080000 0x00020000>; > }; > > }; A simpler version of this change in /ahb I successfully tested with EMC yesterday: - ranges = <0x20000000 0x20000000 0x30000000>; + ranges = <0x20000000 0x20000000 0x30000000 + 0xe0000000 0xe0000000 0x04000000>; > alternatively, each AHB port could be a separate node, with a > more direct translation like > > /ahb5 { > ranges = <0 0x20000000 0x10000000>; > > apb { > ranges = <0 0x80000 0x20000>; > }; > }; > /ahb6 { > ranges = <0 0x30000000 0x10000000>, /* AHB registers */ > <0x80000000 0x80000000 0x40000000>, /* EMC DYCS0/1 */ > <0xE0000000 0xE0000000 0x04000000>; /* EMC CS0-3 */ > > memory-controller@1080000 { > reg = <0x1080000 0x10000>; > }; > }; > ... > > Does this make sense? Yes, I personally would prefer to see the first version as the simplest working one, if needed it should be converted to the second one later on. >> then I'll send a change for inclusion of EMC description -- the one >> above excluding clocks and clock-names properties, work on CCF is in >> progress. > > Ah, very nice! That should get us very close to multiplatform support! > I've just tried building lpc32xx without the headers to check for > other issues, and ended up with the patch below to get it building. > It's clearly wrong, but it highlights a number of issues. Sure, I'll review the highlighted problems, thanks. -- With best wishes, Vladimir -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html