Hi Daniel,
On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 19:32 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> > @@ -88,6 +88,13 @@
> > #clock-cells = <0>;
> > };
> >
> > + cpum_ck: dummy_clk {
>
> I'm not a big fan of this "dummy_clk".
> The 'name' part of the devicetree node is supposed to be generic.
> So, perhaps just oscillator@2, and move it down below clk32k: oscillator@1.
> Otherwise:
cpum_ck is a test clock which only available in IC test. It's empty on
MT8173 evaluation or production boards. Should we name this kind of
empty clock as an oscillator? Or is there a better name for it?
Best regards,
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
