On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 18:49 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 05:10:42PM +0800, Leilk Liu wrote: > > This basically seems fine but there's a couple of issues that should be > relatively easy to fix: > > > + mdata->cur_transfer = xfer; > > + mtk_spi_prepare_transfer(master, xfer); > > + mtk_spi_setup_packet(master, xfer); > > + > > + cnt = (xfer->len % 4) ? (xfer->len / 4 + 1) : (xfer->len / 4); > > Please write this as an if statement for legibility. > OK, I'll fix it. > > +static bool mtk_spi_can_dma(struct spi_master *master, > > + struct spi_device *spi, > > + struct spi_transfer *xfer) > > +{ > > + struct mtk_spi *mdata = spi_master_get_devdata(master); > > + > > + if (xfer->len > MTK_SPI_MAX_FIFO_SIZE) > > + mdata->use_dma = true; > > + else > > + mdata->use_dma = false; > > + > > + return mdata->use_dma; > > +} > > This is broken since can_dma() can be called multiple transfers before > actually doing a transfer (the current implementation loops over all > transfers in a message before starting the message) - you can't store > any local data. The transfer_one() function should do another can_dma() > check to decide if it can DMA, it shouldn't rely on driver global data. > OK, I'll fix it. > > + if (!mdata->use_dma) { > > + if (trans->rx_buf) { > > This should be a variable set when doing the transfer (or perhaps based > on checking spi->cur_xfer with can_dma()). > > > + for (i = 0; i < trans->len; i++) { > > + if (i % 4 == 0) > > + reg_val = > > + readl(mdata->base + SPI_RX_DATA_REG); > > + *((u8 *)(trans->rx_buf + i)) = > > + (reg_val >> ((i % 4) * 8)) & 0xff; > > This isn't the clearest code ever... a comment would help. > OK, I'll fix it. > > + if (mdata->tx_sgl && (mdata->tx_sgl_len == 0)) { > > + mdata->tx_sgl = sg_next(mdata->tx_sgl); > > + if (mdata->tx_sgl) { > > + trans->tx_dma = sg_dma_address(mdata->tx_sgl); > > + mdata->tx_sgl_len = sg_dma_len(mdata->tx_sgl); > > + } > > + } > > There's a *lot* of code in this interrupt handler, and a lot of it looks > an awful lot like the contents of mtk_spi_dma_transfer() has been > cut'n'pasted in. The shared code should all be factored out into a > function called from both places. OK, I'll fix it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html