On Monday, July 27, 2015 10:56:22 AM James Liao wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 19:32 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> > > @@ -88,6 +88,13 @@
> > >
> > > #clock-cells = <0>;
> > >
> > > };
> > >
> > > + cpum_ck: dummy_clk {
> >
> > I'm not a big fan of this "dummy_clk".
> > The 'name' part of the devicetree node is supposed to be generic.
> > So, perhaps just oscillator@2, and move it down below clk32k:
> > oscillator@1.
>
> > Otherwise:
> cpum_ck is a test clock which only available in IC test. It's empty on
> MT8173 evaluation or production boards. Should we name this kind of
> empty clock as an oscillator? Or is there a better name for it?
>
So if it will never be part of any available boards, why do you want to add
it?
Regards,
Matthias
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
