On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 23-06-15, 09:27, Lee Jones wrote: > > Okay, but the reasoning is the same. I consider the function to have > > failed, but the over-all failure culminates in just a warning that > > voltage scaling has indeed failed, but we can still go on with > > frequency scaling. > > Ahh, I thought that the other opp-table will also have voltages. Nope. See patch 1. > > Unless his is a big blocker for you, I would like to keep these > > semantics. > > No, the print is actually fine. Perfect, thanks. > > So technically you are correct, but it makes the code slightly more > > confusing IMHO. Yes, it's one more line of code, but it's worth it to > > add clarity. > > Your call :) Thanks again. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
