On 23-06-15, 09:27, Lee Jones wrote: > Okay, but the reasoning is the same. I consider the function to have > failed, but the over-all failure culminates in just a warning that > voltage scaling has indeed failed, but we can still go on with > frequency scaling. Ahh, I thought that the other opp-table will also have voltages. > Unless his is a big blocker for you, I would like to keep these > semantics. No, the print is actually fine. > So technically you are correct, but it makes the code slightly more > confusing IMHO. Yes, it's one more line of code, but it's worth it to > add clarity. Your call :) -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
