On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 12:32:49PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote: > On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 04:05:08PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > > The 1.0.0 Vector crypto spec states: > > The Zvknhb and Zvbc Vector Crypto Extensions --and accordingly > > the composite extensions Zvkn and Zvks-- require a Zve64x base, > > or application ("V") base Vector Extension. All of the other > > Vector Crypto Extensions can be built on any embedded (Zve*) or > > application ("V") base Vector Extension. > > As previously discussed, the above paragraph incorrectly lists the set of crypto > extensions that require support for 64-bit elements. I have fixed this in the > latest RISC-V ISA manual. It looks like this patch would still do the same > thing either way, since it actually just checks that vector is available in some > form. But this is not the best version of the manual to quote from. /sigh, I updated the binding commit message but not the code one. That one should probably change too, given that's now merged. That's a stupid oversight, thanks.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature