On 12/4/2024 1:48 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
On 04.12.2024 13:38:51, Ciprian Marian Costea wrote:
Unrelated to this patch, but I want to extend the "FLEXCAN hardware
feature flags" table in "flexcan.h". Can you provide the needed
information?
I would say the following S32G related information could be added:
/* FLEXCAN hardware feature flags
*
* Below is some version info we got:
* SOC Version IP-Version Glitch- [TR]WRN_INT IRQ Err Memory err RTR rece- FD Mode MB
* Filter? connected? Passive detection ption in MB Supported?
* MCF5441X FlexCAN2 ? no yes no no no no 16
* MX25 FlexCAN2 03.00.00.00 no no no no no no 64
* MX28 FlexCAN2 03.00.04.00 yes yes no no no no 64
* MX35 FlexCAN2 03.00.00.00 no no no no no no 64
* MX53 FlexCAN2 03.00.00.00 yes no no no no no 64
* MX6s FlexCAN3 10.00.12.00 yes yes no no yes no 64
* MX8QM FlexCAN3 03.00.23.00 yes yes no no yes yes 64
* MX8MP FlexCAN3 03.00.17.01 yes yes no yes yes yes 64
* VF610 FlexCAN3 ? no yes no yes yes? no 64
* LS1021A FlexCAN2 03.00.04.00 no yes no no yes no 64
* LX2160A FlexCAN3 03.00.23.00 no yes no yes yes yes 64
* S32G2/S32G3 FlexCAN3 03.00.39.00 no yes no yes yes yes 128
*
* Some SOCs do not have the RX_WARN & TX_WARN interrupt line connected.
*/
Would you like me to send another version of this patchset with above
information included ?
No. Once we have Krzysztof's ACK for the DT binding changes, I'll take
this series.
I think we'll make that a separate patch and maybe add more information.
regards,
Marc
Hello Krzysztof,
I've addressed your feedback from the previous version of this patchset.
Is the current version ok from your point of view with respect to DT
bindings changes?
Regards,
Ciprian
