On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 22:02:35 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Two patches deal with the either missed or mistyped vendor 'Calao'. The > other two patches deal with improper node names as reported by > dtbs_check. > > Wolfram Sang (4): > ARM: dts: at91: usb_a9263: fix wrong vendor > ARM: dts: at91: use correct vendor name for Calao boards > ARM: dts: at91: calao_usb: fix button nodes > ARM: dts: at91: usb_a9g20_lpw: use proper mmc node name > > arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/tny_a9260.dts | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/tny_a9260_common.dtsi | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/tny_a9263.dts | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/tny_a9g20.dts | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/usb_a9260.dts | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/usb_a9260_common.dtsi | 6 ++---- > arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/usb_a9263.dts | 8 +++----- > arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/usb_a9g20-dab-mmx.dtsi | 10 ++++------ > arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/usb_a9g20.dts | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/usb_a9g20_common.dtsi | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/usb_a9g20_lpw.dts | 4 ++-- > 11 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.45.2 > > > My bot found new DTB warnings on the .dts files added or changed in this series. Some warnings may be from an existing SoC .dtsi. Or perhaps the warnings are fixed by another series. Ultimately, it is up to the platform maintainer whether these warnings are acceptable or not. No need to reply unless the platform maintainer has comments. If you already ran DT checks and didn't see these error(s), then make sure dt-schema is up to date: pip3 install dtschema --upgrade New warnings running 'make CHECK_DTBS=y for arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/' for 20250131210236.36212-6-wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/usb_a9263.dtb: /: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['calao,usb-a9263', 'atmel,at91sam9263', 'atmel,at91sam9']
