On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 03:52:47PM -0600, Robert Nelson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 3:10 PM Tom Rini <trini@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 02:56:19PM -0600, Robert Nelson wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 2:46 PM Andreas Kemnade <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Am Tue, 21 Jan 2025 18:08:24 -0600 > > > > schrieb Tom Rini <trini@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > > > > > > > > If keeping it is just this binding update, then I'd say we keep it, but > > > > > > if it gets any more paninful to maintain, I'm also not going to argue > > > > > > very hard to keep it. > > > > > > > > > > I'm not in the position to see if any of the Pandaboards work at this > > > > > point, so I don't know if they're otherwise functional or a huge pile of > > > > > problems. > > > > > > > > I am still testing stuff with pandaboards. But I do not have the a4 > > > > one. So yes they are functional. Compared with other devices still in > > > > use using the same SoC, here you can play around with everything, know > > > > the device. so it is a reference for keeping the really interesting > > > > devices working. > > > > > > > > Regarding the a4: I think it is better to keep that one in, just that > > > > nobody gets confused if he/she digs out his panda board for some > > > > comparison test and uses a wrong board revision. > > > > > > Do you want an a4? I could dig one or two out! ;) > > > > Unless I'm missing something, the a4 hasn't been bootable by upstream in > > about 10 years now... There's no top-level compatible, so there's no > > match in the generic board code. I can't recall if the A4 versions were > > available to anyone other than maintainers and beagleboard.org folks > > themselves as part of bring-up/testing. I know I had one and ewasted it > > a while ago. > > PandaBoard EA1->A3 = omap4-panda.dtb > PandaBoard A4->+ (non ES) = omap4-panda-a4.dtb > > A4 was the final production version of the non ES Panda.. Oh! My memory sucks here, sorry for the confusion. But it's also still the case that omap4-panda-a4.dtb hasn't had a top-level compatible string, so can it even be functionally used? -- Tom
