On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 2:46 PM Andreas Kemnade <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > Am Tue, 21 Jan 2025 18:08:24 -0600 > schrieb Tom Rini <trini@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > > If keeping it is just this binding update, then I'd say we keep it, but > > > if it gets any more paninful to maintain, I'm also not going to argue > > > very hard to keep it. > > > > I'm not in the position to see if any of the Pandaboards work at this > > point, so I don't know if they're otherwise functional or a huge pile of > > problems. > > I am still testing stuff with pandaboards. But I do not have the a4 > one. So yes they are functional. Compared with other devices still in > use using the same SoC, here you can play around with everything, know > the device. so it is a reference for keeping the really interesting > devices working. > > Regarding the a4: I think it is better to keep that one in, just that > nobody gets confused if he/she digs out his panda board for some > comparison test and uses a wrong board revision. Do you want an a4? I could dig one or two out! ;) Regards, -- Robert Nelson https://rcn-ee.com/