Hi, Am Tue, 21 Jan 2025 18:08:24 -0600 schrieb Tom Rini <trini@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > If keeping it is just this binding update, then I'd say we keep it, but > > if it gets any more paninful to maintain, I'm also not going to argue > > very hard to keep it. > > I'm not in the position to see if any of the Pandaboards work at this > point, so I don't know if they're otherwise functional or a huge pile of > problems. I am still testing stuff with pandaboards. But I do not have the a4 one. So yes they are functional. Compared with other devices still in use using the same SoC, here you can play around with everything, know the device. so it is a reference for keeping the really interesting devices working. Regarding the a4: I think it is better to keep that one in, just that nobody gets confused if he/she digs out his panda board for some comparison test and uses a wrong board revision. Regards, Andreas
