On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 8:26 PM Stanislav Jakubek <stano.jakubek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but this patch seems incorrect to me. > The 1st patch suggets that the sc9632-uart is incompatible with sc9836-uart, > but here you make it fallback to it anyway. > > Also, both of the patches seem to have made it to linux-next without the > reviews/Acks from maintainers. Maybe Greg was a bit too fast here :) > > Regards, > Stanislav Hi Stanislav: Thank you very much for your review, we will correct it in patch v2. Thanks
