Hello Heiko,
On 2025-01-05 14:29, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
Am Freitag, 3. Januar 2025, 07:45:58 CET schrieb FUKAUMI Naoki:
What do you think about the introduction of the "rockchip,rk3582"
compatibility string?
I'm not Kever, but I do like the way you did this :-) .
I.e. the rk3582 _is_ a rk3588 with those cores disabled.
So going the way you did allows us to not introduce too much
overhead while still already having the rk3582 naming in there
if it becomes necessary later on.
I'm glad that you like it, so it hasn't turned out it was me
providing some kind of bad guidance, so to speak. :) [*]
[*]
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/c6ba70f1681bb635190e9452ecb22d59@xxxxxxxxxxx/
On 12/26/24 11:46, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote:
> Add devicetree binding for the Radxa E52C.
>
> Radxa E52C is a compact network computer based on the Rockchip RK3582
> SoC.
>
> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: FUKAUMI Naoki <naoki@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Collect A-b tag
> Changes in v2:
> - Add "rockchip,rk3588s"
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
> index 753199a12923..2152d170524a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
> @@ -812,6 +812,12 @@ properties:
> - const: radxa,e20c
> - const: rockchip,rk3528
>
> + - description: Radxa E52C
> + items:
> + - const: radxa,e52c
> + - const: rockchip,rk3582
> + - const: rockchip,rk3588s
> +
> - description: Radxa Rock
> items:
> - const: radxa,rock
