On 13/12/2024 17:32, Vincenzo Frascino wrote: > Add support for "interrupt-names" and "mbox-name" optional properties. Why? I wonder why you are not cc-ing other maintainers, like only Rob is acceptable by you? <form letter> Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people and lists to CC (and consider --no-git-fallback argument, so you will not CC people just because they made one commit years ago). It might happen, that command when run on an older kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base your patches on recent Linux kernel. Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline) or work on fork of kernel (don't, instead use mainline). Just use b4 and everything should be fine, although remember about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new patches to the patchset. </form letter> > > Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/arm,mhu.yaml | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/arm,mhu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/arm,mhu.yaml > index d9a4f4a02d7c..65a4f66a7273 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/arm,mhu.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/arm,mhu.yaml > @@ -63,6 +63,16 @@ properties: > - description: high-priority non-secure > - description: Secure > > + interrupt-names: > + minItems: 2 > + items: > + - const: mhu-lpri-rx > + - const: mhu-hpri-rx > + - const: mhu-si-rx No, drop. > + > + mbox-name: > + maxItems: 1 No clue what's this, for sure there is no such property at all and commit msg does not explain it. Drop entire patch. Best regards, Krzysztof
