Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: mediatek: mt7623: fix efuse fallback compatible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 07/10/24 16:06, Matthias Brugger ha scritto:


On 17/06/2024 11:46, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx>

Fix following validation error:
arch/arm/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7623a-rfb-emmc.dtb: efuse@10206000: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
         ['mediatek,mt7623-efuse', 'mediatek,mt8173-efuse'] is too long
         'mediatek,mt8173-efuse' was expected
         'mediatek,efuse' was expected
         from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/nvmem/mediatek,efuse.yaml#
arch/arm/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7623a-rfb-emmc.dtb: efuse@10206000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('compatible' was unexpected)
         from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/nvmem/mediatek,efuse.yaml#

Fixes: 43c7a91b4b3a ("arm: dts: mt7623: add efuse nodes to the mt7623.dtsi file")
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/arm/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7623.dtsi | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7623.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7623.dtsi
index 9c5a52ce9351..748f9b366897 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7623.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7623.dtsi
@@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ sysirq: interrupt-controller@10200100 {
      efuse: efuse@10206000 {
          compatible = "mediatek,mt7623-efuse",
-                 "mediatek,mt8173-efuse";
+                 "mediatek,efuse";

Angelo stated that we should move away from generic fallbacks.

That's right.

Although the binding states explicitly to use "mediatek,efuse" and deprecates the standalone "mediate,mt8173-efuse", which could the default fallback. Angelo, what do you think, take it or re-doing the binding first?


No, this is an old SoC, and we want the DTs to be backward compatible as they
should.

Deprecating the generic "mediatek,efuse" fallback is something that we must
enforce only on new SoCs (so, new compatible strings), not on older ones.

So, my call is to take it.

Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Cheers!
Angelo

Regards,
Matthias

          reg = <0 0x10206000 0 0x1000>;
          #address-cells = <1>;
          #size-cells = <1>;





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux