On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 03:44:47PM +0000, Mahapatra, Amit Kumar wrote: > Hello Conor, > > > > >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: spi: xilinx: Add clocks & > > > >>>> clock-names properties > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 06:02:42PM +0530, Amit Kumar Mahapatra wrote: > > > >>>>> Include the 'clocks' and 'clock-names' properties in the AXI > > > >>>>> Quad-SPI bindings. When the AXI4-Lite interface is enabled, the > > > >>>>> core operates in legacy mode, maintaining backward compatibility > > > >>>>> with version 1.00, and uses 's_axi_aclk' and 'ext_spi_clk'. For > > > >>>>> the AXI interface, it uses 's_axi4_aclk' and 'ext_spi_clk'. > > > > > >>>>> + properties: > > > >>>>> + clock-names: > > > >>>>> + items: > > > >>>>> + - const: s_axi_aclk > > > >>>>> + - const: ext_spi_clk > > > >>>> > > > >>>> These are all clocks, there should be no need to have "clk" in the names. > > > >>> > > > >>> These are the names exported by the IP and used by the DTG. > > > >> > > > >> So? This is a binding, not a verilog file. > > > > > > > > Axi Quad SPI is an FPGA-based IP, and the clock names are derived > > > > from the IP signal names as specified in the IP documentation [1]. > > > > We chose these names to ensure alignment with the I/O signal names > > > > listed in Table 2-2 on page 19 of [1]. > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.amd. > > > > com/content/dam/xilinx/support/documents/ip_documentation/axi_quad_s > > > > pi/v3_2/pg153-axi-quad-spi.pdf > > > > > > So if hardware engineers call them "pink_pony_clk_aclk_really_clk" we > > > should follow... > > > > > > - bus or axi > > > - ext_spi or spi > > > > > > You have descriptions of each item to reference real signals. Conor's > > > comment is valid - do no make it verilog file. > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >>>>> + > > > >>>>> + else: > > > >>>>> + properties: > > > >>>>> + clock-names: > > > >>>>> + items: > > > >>>>> + - const: s_axi4_aclk > > > >>>>> + - const: ext_spi_clk > > > > > > Nah, these are the same. > > > > They may be different, depending on whether or not the driver has to handle "axi4- > > lite" versus "axi" differently. That said, I find the commit message kinda odd in that it > > states that axi4-lite goes with the s_axi_aclk clock and axi goes with s_axi4_aclk. > > Apologies for the typo. When the AXI4 interface is enabled, it uses s_axi4_aclk, and > when the AXI4-Lite interface is enabled, it uses s_axi_aclk. > > In my next series I will update my commit message & change the clock-names > 's_axi4_aclk', 's_axi_aclk' & 'ext_spi_clk' to 'axi4', 'axi' & 'ref' respectively There's no driver here, so it is hard to know (why isn't there?) - are you using the axi v axi4 to do some sort of differentiation in the driver?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
