Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] dt-bindings: mtd: spi-nor: add OTP parameters

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 17 Sept 2024 at 19:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 17/09/2024 19:24, Erez wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It does not look like you tested the bindings, at least after quick
> >>>>>> look. Please run `make dt_binding_check` (see
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I run "make dt_binding_check" on kernel 6.6.
> >>>>
> >>>> Yeah, we are no on kernel 6.6. You can run it also on kernel v4.1 -
> >>>> still does not matter.
> >>>>
> >>>> Don't develop on ancient code because then you ask us to review same
> >>>> broken stuff we already fixed.
> >>>
> >>> I test with Beaglebone black for testing, it is difficult to run the
> >>> last vanille version.
> >>> I did backport the spi-nor driver.
> >>> As for "make dt_binding_check" on last kernel, it need to upgrade the tools,
> >>>  and I did not think it could change that much.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Well, it is possible to build kernel on small embedded board, but that's
> >> quite cumbersone, slow and inefficient, considering that it's just
> >> easier to cross compile. But anyway, binding check does not even need
> >> cross compilation.
> >>
> >> Sorry, the code is obviously wrong, there is no such thing as u32, so
> >> you did not test it. I provided link which explains how to test it. You
> >> must do it on latest mainline kernel. Just like you must develop and
> >> generate patches on latest mainline kernel, because this is where we
> >> apply the patches. We do not apply them to v6.6.
> >
> > The patches are based on the lastest  mainline kernel.
> > I do not understand why you think otherwise.
>
> Because you wrote:
> "I run "make dt_binding_check" on kernel 6.6."
>
> The command is either part of build process or final check process
> (static analyzers etc). If you say you did this on v6.6, you got such
> response.

I know you are NOT a service.
The device tree is not the focus of my work.
It should not be broken like that.

I install dt-schema_2023.11-3_all.deb
with Debian trixie
I get:

l
  SCHEMA  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/dt-mk-schema", line 8, in <module>
    sys.exit(main())
             ^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/dtschema/mk_schema.py", line 28, in main
    schemas = dtschema.DTValidator(args.schemas).schemas
              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/dtschema/validator.py", line
363, in __init__
    self.make_property_type_cache()
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/dtschema/validator.py", line
420, in make_property_type_cache
    self.props, self.pat_props = get_prop_types(self.schemas)
                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/dtschema/validator.py", line
187, in get_prop_types
    del props[r'^[a-z][a-z0-9\-]*$']
        ~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
KeyError: '^[a-z][a-z0-9\\-]*$'
make[2]: *** [Documentation/devicetree/bindings/Makefile:64:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json] Error 1
make[2]: *** Deleting file
'Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json'
make[1]: *** [/home/builder/kernel/Makefile:1435: dt_binding_schemas] Error 2

Erez


>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux