On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 12:38:23PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 09/09/2024 12:17, Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 03:46:27PM +0800, WangYuli wrote: > >> From: William Qiu <william.qiu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> In JH7110 SoC, we need to go by-pass mode, so we need add the > >> assigned-clock* properties to limit clock frquency. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: William Qiu <william.qiu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Reviewed-by: Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: WangYuli <wangyuli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > What makes any of the patches in this 4 patch series stable material? > > That's for stable? It needs to follow stable process rules, so proper > commit ID. [6.6] in the subject and Sasha/Greg/stable list on CC, so I figure it is for stable, yeah. Only one of these patches is a "fix", and not really a functional one, so I would like to know why this stuff is being backported. I think under some definition of "new device IDs and quirks" it could be suitable, but it'd be a looser definition than I personally agree with! Oh, and also, the 4 patches aren't threaded - you should fix that WangYuli.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
