On 2024/9/9 19:17, Conor Dooley wrote:
[6.6] in the subject and Sasha/Greg/stable list on CC, so I figure it is
for stable, yeah. Only one of these patches is a "fix", and not really a
functional one, so I would like to know why this stuff is being
backported. I think under some definition of "new device IDs and quirks"
it could be suitable, but it'd be a looser definition than I personally
agree with!
These submissions will help to ensure a more stable behavior for the
RISC-V devices involved on the Linux-6.6.y kernel,and as far as I can
tell,they won't introduce any new issues (please correct me if I'm wrong).
Oh, and also, the 4 patches aren't threaded - you should fix that
I apologize for my ignorance about the correct procedure...
For instance,for these four commits,I first used 'git format-patch -4'
to create four consecutive .patch files,and then used 'git send-email
--annotate --cover-letter --thread ./*.patch' to send them,but the
result wasn't as expected...
I'm not sure where the problem lies...
WangYuli.
QAQ
--
WangYuli
