On 28/08/2024 07:39, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 27.08.24 19:30, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 27/08/2024 18:20, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> On 27.08.24 17:33, Rob Herring wrote: >>>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 9:29 AM Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> To allow firmware to pick up all DTs from here, move the overlays that >>>>> are normally applied during DT fixup to the kernel source as well. Hook >>>>> then into the build nevertheless to ensure that regular checks are >>>>> performed. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> --- >>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile | 2 + >>>>> ...48-iot2050-advanced-m2-bkey-ekey-pcie.dtso | 27 +++++++++++ >>>>> ...-am6548-iot2050-advanced-m2-bkey-usb3.dtso | 47 +++++++++++++++++++ >>>>> 3 files changed, 76 insertions(+) >>>>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced-m2-bkey-ekey-pcie.dtso >>>>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced-m2-bkey-usb3.dtso >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile >>>>> index e20b27ddf901..f459af7fac0d 100644 >>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile >>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile >>>>> @@ -77,6 +77,8 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-am6528-iot2050-basic.dtb >>>>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-am6528-iot2050-basic-pg2.dtb >>>>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced.dtb >>>>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced-m2.dtb >>>>> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced-m2-bkey-ekey-pcie.dtbo >>>>> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced-m2-bkey-usb3.dtbo >>>> >>>> You are missing applying these overlays to anything. That is a >>>> requirement for any overlay in the tree. >>> >>> You mean apply for testing purposes? How, technically? >> >> Apply as build a target combining base DTS and overlay. See all other >> overlays for technical aspect (just do the same). >> > > OK, it's about the magic behind the -dtbs vars. > > BTW, it's not "all". I would say about 10% of the overlays are "dangling". Yeah, true. There were several commits adding targets for base+overlay, but probably still not everything is corrected, so my "all" was exaggerated. Best regards, Krzysztof
