On Sun, Jul 07, 2024 at 02:37:59PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Sun, 7 Jul 2024 14:02:39 +0200 > Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: ... > So, I don't see this as a deliberate attempt to bypass a maintainer Nack. > I'd love to be in a position to say no on ACPI bindings that are garbage > (there are a lot of them) but Windows is dominant in that space so > we get stuck with their mess. ...and we are trying hard to avoid this mess in the future (e.g., what is happening to MIPI I3C case nowadays). Unfortunately Linux world seems not being so interested in this topic either (as my proposal to discuss the ACPI ID topic on LPC has been rejected). > On server's it is a different game > and the kernel community regularly gets significant changes made. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
