On 12/08/2024 15:21, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 8/12/24 04:38, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 31/07/2024 17:12, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 03:27:50PM +0200, Farouk Bouabid wrote: >>>> Theobroma Systems Mule is an MCU that emulates a set of I2C devices, >>>> among which is an amc6821 and other devices that are reachable through >>>> an I2C-mux. >>>> >>>> The devices on the mux can be selected by writing the appropriate device >>>> number to an I2C config register (amc6821: reg 0xff) >>>> >>>> Implement "tsd,mule" compatible to instantiate the I2C-mux platform device >>>> when probing the amc6821. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Farouk Bouabid <farouk.bouabid@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Applied. >> >> Eh, there is undocumented dependency on I2C here. Next has warning >> because of this. >> >> Farouk, please *always mention* the dependencies between patches. >> >> Best regards, >> Krzysztof >> >> > Sorry, I wasn't aware that all bindings have to be in the tree before I apply > patches, and I somehow had the apparently wrong impression that the bindings None of us were aware of it and bindings were in fact approved, so I would do the same as you - picked up patches. > were approved. I'll drop the two patches (this one and the DT patch for > amc6821). Someone may need to remind me to re-apply them after all > pre-dependencies are in the tree. Thanks, that would solve the issue. Best regards, Krzysztof
