On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 12:45:48PM +0300, David Abdurachmanov wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 7:31 PM Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 02:23:47AM +0000, Xingyu Wu wrote: > > > On 15/05/2024 02:08, Conor Dooley wrote: > > > > > > There's a push in U-Boot to move devicestrees to use "OF_UPSTREAM", which > > > > means importing devicetrees directly from Linux and using them in U-Boot. I > > > > don't really want to merge a patch that would present U-Boot with a problem if > > > > the VisionFive 2 moved to that model there. > > > > > Would it be better if I change the rates of PLL0 and CPU core in the driver not dts, > > > and avoid the dts of Linux and U-Boot being different? > > > > I'd definitely prefer if we don't include stuff in the kernel tree that > > would cause problems for U-Boot if imported there, yeah. > > > > What is the current state of this patchset? v6: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240603020607.25122-1-xingyu.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ Guess it didn't go to the riscv ml because the dts patch was dropped. > I noticed this patchset on the U-Boot side from Hal Feng: > [PATCH v1 0/4] Sync StarFive JH7110 clock and reset dt-bindings with Linux > > It seems to indicate that there is WIP for OF_UPSTREAM support. And as a commenter on that patchset you reference said, they should actually use OF_UPSTREAM directly rather than manual syncs like that series. I'm not sure how the U-Boot folks want to address that w.r.t. bisection though, in cases like this where the defines do not have identical names. Thanks, Conor.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
