Hello, On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 03:32:01PM +0800, Binbin Zhou wrote: > When I was submitting the Loongson PWM dt-binding, Rob reminded me that > the pwm-cells property was already required in pwm.yaml and did not need > to be repeated. > > This patchset attempts to clean up the required pwm-cells attribute twice. > > Thanks. > > Binbin Zhou (6): > dt-bindings: pwm: bcm2835: Do not require pwm-cells twice > dt-bindings: pwm: google,cros-ec: Do not require pwm-cells twice > dt-bindings: pwm: marvell,pxa: Do not require pwm-cells twice > dt-bindings: pwm: mediatek,mt2712: Do not require pwm-cells twice > dt-bindings: pwm: mediatek,pwm-disp: Do not require pwm-cells twice > dt-bindings: pwm: snps,dw-apb-timers: Do not require pwm-cells twice > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/google,cros-ec-pwm.yaml | 1 - > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/marvell,pxa-pwm.yaml | 1 - > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,mt2712-pwm.yaml | 1 - > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml | 1 - > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-bcm2835.yaml | 1 - > .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/snps,dw-apb-timers-pwm2.yaml | 1 - > 6 files changed, 6 deletions(-) Applied the series to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ukleinek/linux.git pwm/for-next Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/renesas,tpu-pwm.yaml seems to be another candidate for a similar cleanup. Thanks for your cleanup, Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
