Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] pwm: sophgo: add pwm support for Sophgo CV1800 SoC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, Uwe

On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 10:54 PM Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 02:34:13PM +0800, Jingbao Qiu wrote:
> > Implement the PWM driver for CV1800.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jingbao Qiu <qiujingbao.dlmu@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pwm/Kconfig      |  10 ++
> >  drivers/pwm/Makefile     |   1 +
> >  drivers/pwm/pwm-cv1800.c | 296 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 307 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-cv1800.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> > index 1dd7921194f5..3869ca022aeb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> > @@ -182,6 +182,16 @@ config PWM_CROS_EC
> >         PWM driver for exposing a PWM attached to the ChromeOS Embedded
> >         Controller.
> >
> > +config PWM_CV1800
> > +     tristate "Sophgo CV1800 PWM driver"
> > +     depends on ARCH_SOPHGO || COMPILE_TEST
> > +     help
> > +       Generic PWM framework driver for the Sophgo CV1800 series
> > +       SoCs.
> > +
> > +       To compile this driver as a module, build the dependecies
> > +       as modules, this will be called pwm-cv1800.
> > +
> >  config PWM_DWC_CORE
> >       tristate
> >       depends on HAS_IOMEM
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Makefile b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
> > index 90913519f11a..6295e2259efc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pwm/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
> > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_CLK)               += pwm-clk.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_CLPS711X)   += pwm-clps711x.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_CRC)                += pwm-crc.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_CROS_EC)    += pwm-cros-ec.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_CV1800)     += pwm-cv1800.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_DWC_CORE)   += pwm-dwc-core.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_DWC)                += pwm-dwc.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_EP93XX)     += pwm-ep93xx.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-cv1800.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-cv1800.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..37a6be3f63aa
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-cv1800.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,296 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > +/*
> > + * Sophgo CV1800 PWM driver
> > + * Author: Jingbao Qiu <qiujingbao.dlmu@xxxxxxxxx>
> > + *
> > + * Limitations:
> > + * - It output low when PWM channel disabled.
>
> Just to be sure: the output is low independant of the POLARITY register?

When the value of the POLARITY register is 1, the PWM outputs a high level.
When the value of the POLARITY register is 0, the PWM output is low.
Should I make this point here?

>
> > + * - This pwm device supports dynamic loading of PWM parameters. When PWMSTART
> > + *   is written from 0 to 1, the register value (HLPERIODn, PERIODn) will be
> > + *   temporarily stored inside the PWM. If you want to dynamically change the
> > + *   waveform during PWM output, after writing the new value to HLPERIODn and
> > + *   PERIODn, write 1 and then 0 to PWMUPDATE[n] to make the new value effective.
> > + * - Supports up to Rate/2 output, and the lowest is about Rate/(2^30-1).
> > + * - By setting HLPERIODn to 0, can produce 100% duty cycle.
> > + * - This hardware could support inverted polarity. By default, the value of the
> > + *   POLARITY register is 0x0. This means that HLPERIOD represents the number
> > + *   of low level beats.
> > + * - This hardware supports input mode and output mode, implemented through the
> > + *   Output-Enable/OE register. However, this driver has not yet implemented
> > + *   capture callback.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/clk.h>
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/pwm.h>
> > +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> > +
> > +#define PWM_CV1800_HLPERIOD_BASE    0x00
> > +#define PWM_CV1800_PERIOD_BASE      0x04
> > +#define PWM_CV1800_POLARITY         0x40
> > +#define PWM_CV1800_START            0x44
> > +#define PWM_CV1800_DONE             0x48
> > +#define PWM_CV1800_UPDATE           0x4c
> > +#define PWM_CV1800_OE               0xd0
> > +
> > +#define PWM_CV1800_HLPERIOD(n)      (PWM_CV1800_HLPERIOD_BASE + ((n)*0x08))
> > +#define PWM_CV1800_PERIOD(n)        (PWM_CV1800_PERIOD_BASE + ((n)*0x08))
> > +
> > +#define PWM_CV1800_UPDATE_MASK(n)   (BIT(0) << (n))
> > +#define PWM_CV1800_OE_MASK(n)       (BIT(0) << (n))
> > +#define PWM_CV1800_START_MASK(n)    (BIT(0) << (n))
> > +#define PWM_CV1800_POLARITY_MASK(n) (BIT(0) << (n))
> > +
> > +#define PWM_CV1800_MAXPERIOD        0x3fffffff
> > +#define PWM_CV1800_MINPERIOD        2
> > +#define PWM_CV1800_CHANNELS         4
> > +#define PWM_CV1800_PERIOD_RESET     BIT(1)
> > +#define PWM_CV1800_HLPERIOD_RESET   BIT(0)
> > +#define PWM_CV1800_REG_DISABLE      0x00U
> > +#define PWM_CV1800_REG_ENABLE(n)    (BIT(0) << (n))
>
> BIT(n)?

yes, I will fix it.

>
> > +
> > +struct cv1800_pwm {
> > +     struct regmap *map;
> > +     struct clk *clk;
> > +     unsigned long clk_rate;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static inline struct cv1800_pwm *to_cv1800_pwm_dev(struct pwm_chip *chip)
> > +{
> > +     return pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct regmap_config cv1800_pwm_regmap_config = {
> > +     .reg_bits = 32,
> > +     .val_bits = 32,
> > +     .reg_stride = 4,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int cv1800_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> > +                          bool enable)
> > +{
> > +     struct cv1800_pwm *priv = to_cv1800_pwm_dev(chip);
> > +     u32 pwm_enable, state;
> > +
> > +     regmap_read(priv->map, PWM_CV1800_START, &pwm_enable);
> > +     pwm_enable &= PWM_CV1800_START_MASK(pwm->hwpwm);
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * If the parameters are changed during runtime, Register needs
> > +      * to be updated to take effect.
> > +      */
> > +     if (pwm_enable && enable) {
> > +             regmap_update_bits(priv->map, PWM_CV1800_UPDATE,
> > +                                PWM_CV1800_UPDATE_MASK(pwm->hwpwm),
> > +                                PWM_CV1800_REG_ENABLE(pwm->hwpwm));
> > +             regmap_update_bits(priv->map, PWM_CV1800_UPDATE,
> > +                                PWM_CV1800_UPDATE_MASK(pwm->hwpwm),
> > +                                PWM_CV1800_REG_DISABLE);
>
> I think using a plain 0 instead of PWM_CV1800_REG_DISABLE would be a tad
> clearer.

I will fix it.

>
> > +     } else if (!pwm_enable && enable) {
> > +             regmap_update_bits(priv->map, PWM_CV1800_START,
> > +                                PWM_CV1800_START_MASK(pwm->hwpwm),
> > +                                PWM_CV1800_REG_ENABLE(pwm->hwpwm));
> > +     } else if (pwm_enable && !enable) {
> > +             regmap_update_bits(priv->map, PWM_CV1800_START,
> > +                                PWM_CV1800_START_MASK(pwm->hwpwm),
> > +                                PWM_CV1800_REG_DISABLE);
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     /* check and set OE/Output-Enable mode */
> > +     regmap_read(priv->map, PWM_CV1800_OE, &state);
> > +     state &= PWM_CV1800_OE_MASK(pwm->hwpwm);
> > +
> > +     if (state == PWM_CV1800_REG_DISABLE && enable)
>
> Here I'd use:
>
>         regmap_read(priv->map, PWM_CV1800_OE, &state);
>
>         if ((state & BIT(pwm->hwpwm)) && enable)
>

I will fix it.

> > +             regmap_update_bits(priv->map, PWM_CV1800_OE,
> > +                                PWM_CV1800_OE_MASK(pwm->hwpwm),
> > +                                PWM_CV1800_REG_ENABLE(pwm->hwpwm));
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > [...]
> > +static int cv1800_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +     struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > +     struct cv1800_pwm *priv;
> > +     struct pwm_chip *chip;
> > +     void __iomem *base;
> > +     int ret;
> > +
> > +     chip = devm_pwmchip_alloc(dev, PWM_CV1800_CHANNELS, sizeof(*priv));
> > +     if (!chip)
> > +             return PTR_ERR(chip);
> > +     priv = to_cv1800_pwm_dev(chip);
> > +
> > +     base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> > +     if (IS_ERR(base))
> > +             return PTR_ERR(base);
> > +
> > +     priv->map = devm_regmap_init_mmio(&pdev->dev, base,
> > +                                       &cv1800_pwm_regmap_config);
> > +     if (IS_ERR(priv->map))
> > +             return PTR_ERR(priv->map);
>
> devm_regmap_init_mmio() doesnt' emit an error message on failure, so
> please add one here.

I will fix it.

Thank you for your suggestion.

Best regards
Jingbao Qiu





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux