On Fri, 2024-04-12 at 09:43 -0500, Eddie James wrote:
> Set the new compatible string for Odyssey SBEFIFOs so that they
> don't collect async FFDC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eddie James <eajames@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-ibm-everest.dts | 64 +++++++++----------
> .../arm/boot/dts/aspeed/ibm-power10-quad.dtsi | 64 +++++++++----------
> 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-ibm-everest.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-ibm-everest.dts
> index 214b2e6a4c6d..3a2bfdf035cb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-ibm-everest.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-ibm-everest.dts
> @@ -2545,7 +2545,7 @@ scom500: scom@1000 {
> };
>
> sbefifo500: sbefifo@2400 {
> - compatible = "ibm,p9-sbefifo";
> + compatible = "ibm,ody-sbefifo";
> reg = <0x2400 0x400>;
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
Bit of a drive-by comment as I'm not really holding any stakes here,
but did the hardware actually change?
Would it be better to request the behaviour by a property rather than
changing the compatible?
Andrew
