On Fri, 2024-04-12 at 09:43 -0500, Eddie James wrote: > The SBEFIFO engine provides an interface to the POWER processor > Self Boto Engine (SBE). > > Signed-off-by: Eddie James <eajames@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/fsi/ibm,sbefifo.yaml | 39 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/ibm,sbefifo.yaml > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/ibm,sbefifo.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/ibm,sbefifo.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..d70012e42d79 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/ibm,sbefifo.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/fsi/ibm,sbefifo.yaml# > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > + > +title: IBM FSI-attached SBEFIFO engine > + > +maintainers: > + - Eddie James <eajames@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > + > +description: | > + This binding describes an FSI CFAM engine called the SBEFIFO. Therefore this > + node will always be a child of an FSI CFAM node; see fsi.txt for details on > + FSI slave and CFAM nodes. This SBEFIFO engine provides an interface to the > + POWER processor Self Boot Engine (SBE). > + > +properties: > + compatible: > + enum: > + - ibm,p9-sbefifo > + - ibm,ody-sbefifo Bit of a nitpick, but: Is there any argument against using `ibm,odyssey-sbefifo`? Feels less cryptic. Andrew
