On 4/8/24 1:58 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Sat, Apr 6, 2024 at 8:26 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Would it be OK if I send a v2 without the USB C connector description
and address your other comments?
No, because I think this should be the connector. Look at datasheet of
ptn5150 and ptn5110. Aren't both describing similar hardware?
Instead adding some sort of hacked-hardware-representation, please
investigate why your previous commit broke things.
Yes, you are right.
I don't have access to any board with a PTN5150, so I can't debug it myself.
I have 5150, it is on my list of things to look into, it just might not
be right away. I'll revisit this once I get to it.
