On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 2:30 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 09/04/2024 03:37, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 11:06 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 08/04/2024 10:01, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +anyOf:
> >>>>> + - required:
> >>>>> + - spdif-in
> >>>>> + - required:
> >>>>> + - spdif-out
> >>>>> + - required:
> >>>>> + - spdif-out
> >>>>> + - spdif-in
> >>>>
> >>>> Do you need the last required block?
> >>>
> >>> Yes, one of them or both are required.
> >>
> >> And? It's already there: that's the meaning of any. It is not oneOf...
> >> Before answering please test your changes and ideas. I pointed issue
> >> here and you responded just to close my comment. That does not make me
> >> happy, just wastes my time.
> >
> > Maybe I didn't express clearly.
> >
> > we need at least one of them (spdif-in, spdif-out) in the node. which means
> > that we need to select "spdif-in", or "spdif-out", or "spdif-in and
> > spdif-out".
> >
> > So my understanding is that need to use "anyOf", if it is wrong, please let
> > me know.
>
> Third time: it is wrong.
>
> Can you test the code instead continuing this discussion
Every time I change I definitely do dtbs_check test.
But There is no error reported by dtbs_check.
But finally I understand that
anyOf:
- required:
- spdif-in
- required:
- spdif-out
- required:
- spdif-out
- spdif-in
is equal to:
anyOf:
- required:
- spdif-in
- required:
- spdif-out
best regards
Shengjiu Wang
